Advisor Equity Grants

A small equity grant given to an advisor in exchange for ongoing, informal guidance — sized far below a co-founder or employee grant and vested over a shorter schedule.

Why does Advisor Equity Grants matter?

Advisor equity is cheap to over-grant and expensive to claw back, so the sizing decision matters more than it looks like it should for a number that is usually a fraction of a percent. Grant too generously across too many advisors and the cap table accumulates dead weight that dilutes everyone else for guidance that, in practice, was a handful of calls. Grant nothing and a genuinely valuable advisor — someone who opens doors or catches mistakes a founder cannot see — has no reason to keep showing up once the novelty wears off.

What does Advisor Equity Grants look like in practice?

Suppose a company at seed stage grants an advisor 0.25% of the company, vesting monthly over two years, in exchange for a standing monthly call and warm introductions to potential customers. That is roughly in line with common early-stage advisor grids, which scale grant size down as the company matures and its equity becomes worth more. The same 0.25% granted to five different advisors for loosely defined help adds up to more dilution than most founders realize until they see it totaled on the cap table.

What are the common mistakes with Advisor Equity Grants?

  • Granting equity without a vesting schedule, so an advisor who disengages after one conversation keeps the full grant.
  • Using founder- or employee-sized grants for advisory relationships that involve a few hours a month.
  • Adding advisors to the cap table faster than the company adds evidence that any of them are actually useful.
  • Never revisiting inactive advisor relationships, leaving stale grants on the table indefinitely.

Related concepts

Stop looking these up one at a time

Lev works through the whole arc with you — customers, positioning, pricing, the pitch — and explains the vocabulary as it goes.

Start with your idea